Developing a Model Work Plan: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 21:07, 25 June 2024

The Model Work Plan should address each of the following topics. The level of detail will vary depending on the complexity of the project. If something is not applicable to the project, a brief statement on why it is not applicable may be sufficient. General topics should be addressed in all modeling efforts, while application-specific topics should be addressed for modeling efforts that plan to use these types of analyses. It is not necessary at this stage to have all the answers, but the method for answering the questions should be stated.

General Considerations for All Models

Describe the model purpose and justification of need.

Summarize the overall assumptions and modeling approach.

Note the guidance documents used as basis for approach (e.g., state published guidance, USBR Design Standards, FERC Engineering Guidelines for Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, USACE Engineering Manuals, etc.)

Summarize the possible and expected outcomes.

Summarize the data that is available or will be collected as part of the process.

Provide an assessment of which assumptions are foundational (i.e., modifying assumptions would require additional communication and concurrence) and which can be modified through the analysis process.

If an Independent Review is planned, describe the relationships and responsibilities of the parties involved (third party, internal to modeling firm or expectations for regulatory agency review)

Note factors that may increase the modeling level of effort. This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.

Describe how interim and final modeling results will be presented (written report, presentation, discussion, etc.). This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.

Include a recommended schedule for submittals, review, and regulatory feedback. Note critical deadlines to avoid project delays. Request regulatory agency concurrence with the schedule as part of feedback on the Model Work Plan.

Application-Specific Considerations

Development of this page was sponsored by the Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation with funding from the FEMA Assistance to States Grant Program.

Revision ID: 8013
Revision Date: 06/25/2024

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ===General Considerations for All Models===
-*	Describe the model '''purpose and justification''' of need.
+*	Describe the model purpose and justification of need.
-*	Summarize the overall '''assumptions and modeling approach'''.
+*	Summarize the overall assumptions and modeling approach.
-*	Note the '''guidance documents''' used as basis for approach (e.g., state published guidance, USBR Design Standards, FERC Engineering Guidelines for Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, USACE Engineering Manuals, etc.)
+*	Note the guidance documents used as basis for approach (e.g., state published guidance, USBR Design Standards, FERC Engineering Guidelines for Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, USACE Engineering Manuals, etc.)
-*	Summarize the '''possible and expected outcomes'''.
+*	Summarize the possible and expected outcomes.
-*	Summarize the '''data that is available or will be collected''' as part of the process.
+*	Summarize the data that is available or will be collected as part of the process.
-*	Provide an '''assessment of which assumptions are foundational''' (i.e., modifying assumptions would require additional communication and concurrence) and which can be modified through the analysis process.
+*	Provide an assessment of which assumptions are foundational (i.e., modifying assumptions would require additional communication and concurrence) and which can be modified through the analysis process.
-*	If an Independent Review is planned, describe the relationships and '''responsibilities of the parties involved''' (third party, internal to modeling firm or expectations for regulatory agency review)
+*	If an Independent Review is planned, describe the relationships and responsibilities of the parties involved (third party, internal to modeling firm or expectations for regulatory agency review)
-*	Note '''factors that may increase the modeling level of effort'''. This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
+*	Note factors that may increase the modeling level of effort. This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
-*	Describe how '''interim and final modeling results''' will be presented (written report, presentation, discussion, etc.). This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
+*	Describe how interim and final modeling results will be presented (written report, presentation, discussion, etc.). This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
-*	Include a '''recommended schedule''' for submittals, review, and regulatory feedback. Note critical deadlines to avoid project delays. Request regulatory agency concurrence with the schedule as part of feedback on the Model Work Plan.
+*	Include a recommended schedule for submittals, review, and regulatory feedback. Note critical deadlines to avoid project delays. Request regulatory agency concurrence with the schedule as part of feedback on the Model Work Plan.
 ===Application-Specific Considerations===