Developing a Model Work Plan: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<!-- Default code to remove table of contents and add line break at top of page --> __NOTOC__ <!-- Add Category to drive breadcrumb menus --> Category: Pre-Analysis Communication ---- <noautolinks> The model work plan submittal should address an understanding of the model objectives, project constraints, and overall approach should be developed. In order to develop this project understanding, the dam owner and engineer/modeler should meet to discuss the modeling a...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<noautolinks> | <noautolinks> | ||
The | The Model Work Plan should address each of the following topics. The level of detail will vary depending on the complexity of the project. If something is not applicable to the project, a brief statement on why it is not applicable may be sufficient. General topics should be addressed in all modeling efforts, while application-specific topics should be addressed for modeling efforts that plan to use these types of analyses. It is not necessary at this stage to have all the answers, but the method for answering the questions should be stated. | ||
===General Considerations for All Models=== | ===General Considerations for All Models=== | ||
* | * Describe the model '''purpose and justification''' of need. | ||
* | * Summarize the overall '''assumptions and modeling approach'''. | ||
* ''' | * Note the '''guidance documents''' used as basis for approach (e.g., state published guidance, USBR Design Standards, FERC Engineering Guidelines for Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, USACE Engineering Manuals, etc.) | ||
* | * Summarize the '''possible and expected outcomes'''. | ||
* | * Summarize the '''data that is available or will be collected''' as part of the process. | ||
* | * Provide an '''assessment of which assumptions are foundational''' (i.e., modifying assumptions would require additional communication and concurrence) and which can be modified through the analysis process. | ||
* If an Independent Review is planned, | * If an Independent Review is planned, describe the relationships and '''responsibilities of the parties involved''' (third party, internal to modeling firm or expectations for regulatory agency review) | ||
* ''' | * Note '''factors that may increase the modeling level of effort'''. This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations. | ||
* | * Describe how '''interim and final modeling results''' will be presented (written report, presentation, discussion, etc.). This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations. | ||
* ''' | * Include a '''recommended schedule''' for submittals, review, and regulatory feedback. Note critical deadlines to avoid project delays. Request regulatory agency concurrence with the schedule as part of feedback on the Model Work Plan. | ||
===Application-Specific Considerations=== | ===Application-Specific Considerations=== |
Revision as of 21:03, 25 June 2024
The Model Work Plan should address each of the following topics. The level of detail will vary depending on the complexity of the project. If something is not applicable to the project, a brief statement on why it is not applicable may be sufficient. General topics should be addressed in all modeling efforts, while application-specific topics should be addressed for modeling efforts that plan to use these types of analyses. It is not necessary at this stage to have all the answers, but the method for answering the questions should be stated.
General Considerations for All Models
- Describe the model purpose and justification of need.
- Summarize the overall assumptions and modeling approach.
- Note the guidance documents used as basis for approach (e.g., state published guidance, USBR Design Standards, FERC Engineering Guidelines for Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, USACE Engineering Manuals, etc.)
- Summarize the possible and expected outcomes.
- Summarize the data that is available or will be collected as part of the process.
- Provide an assessment of which assumptions are foundational (i.e., modifying assumptions would require additional communication and concurrence) and which can be modified through the analysis process.
- If an Independent Review is planned, describe the relationships and responsibilities of the parties involved (third party, internal to modeling firm or expectations for regulatory agency review)
- Note factors that may increase the modeling level of effort. This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
- Describe how interim and final modeling results will be presented (written report, presentation, discussion, etc.). This is also a discussion item with the dam owner during scope of work negotiations.
- Include a recommended schedule for submittals, review, and regulatory feedback. Note critical deadlines to avoid project delays. Request regulatory agency concurrence with the schedule as part of feedback on the Model Work Plan.
Application-Specific Considerations
- Slope Stability Modeling
- Seepage Modeling
- Hydrologic Modeling
- Hydraulic Modeling
- Consequence Estimating
Development of this page was sponsored by the Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation with funding from the FEMA Assistance to States Grant Program.
Revision ID: 8011
Revision Date: 06/25/2024