Design and Construction of Gates/Bulkheads: Difference between revisions
Rmanwaring (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ ---- <!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> ==Bulkheads== “A bulkhead or stoplog and guides should be provided at the entrance to each water passage for dewatering the service and emergency gates for maintenance except when they are excessively costly or clearly unfeasible and other means can be improvised. When emergency gates are not required, stoplog or bulkhead guides for maintenance should alway...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category:Gates and Bulkheads]] | |||
---- | ---- | ||
<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> | <!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> | ||
==Bulkheads== | ==Bulkheads== | ||
“A bulkhead or stoplog and guides should be provided at the entrance to each water passage for dewatering the service and emergency gates for maintenance except when they are excessively costly or clearly unfeasible and other means can be improvised. When emergency gates are not required, stoplog or bulkhead guides for maintenance should always be provided upstream of the service gates”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2400">[[Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400) | | “A bulkhead or stoplog and guides should be provided at the entrance to each water passage for [[dewatering]] the service and emergency gates for maintenance except when they are excessively costly or clearly unfeasible and other means can be improvised. When emergency gates are not required, stoplog or bulkhead guides for maintenance should always be provided upstream of the service gates”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2400">[[Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400) | Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400), USACE, 2003]]</ref> | ||
==Gates== | ==Gates== | ||
“Controlled spillways include crest gates that serve as a movable damming surface allowing the spillway crest to be located below the normal operating level of a reservoir or channel”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702">[[Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702) | EM 1110-2-2702 | “Controlled [[spillways]] include crest gates that serve as a movable damming surface allowing the spillway crest to be located below the normal operating level of a reservoir or channel”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702">[[Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702) | Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702), USACE, 2000]]</ref> | ||
“Gates are composed primarily of structural steel and are generally of welded fabrication. Structural members are typically rolled sections; however, welded built-up girders may be required for large gates”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | “Gates are composed primarily of [[structural]] steel and are generally of welded fabrication. Structural members are typically rolled sections; however, welded built-up girders may be required for large gates”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | ||
“The hydraulic engineer will normally establish the limiting parameters for gate height and width. Within those limits, various height-to-width ratios should be studied to find the most suitable gate size for the project. The structural designer should coordinate closely with the hydraulic engineer in determining the basic limiting requirements for size and shape. The size, shape, and framing system of the gates should be selected to minimize the overall cost of the spillway, rather than the gate itself. Determination of gate size will also consider practical operation and maintenance considerations specific to the project”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | “The hydraulic engineer will normally establish the limiting parameters for gate height and width. Within those limits, various height-to-width ratios should be studied to find the most suitable gate size for the project. The structural designer should coordinate closely with the hydraulic engineer in determining the basic limiting requirements for size and shape. The size, shape, and framing system of the gates should be selected to minimize the overall cost of the spillway, rather than the gate itself. Determination of gate size will also consider practical [[operation]] and maintenance considerations specific to the project”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | ||
“The gate width will be determined based on such factors as maximum desirable width of monoliths, length of spillway, bridge spans, drift loading, overall monolith stability, and loads on trunnions and anchorages. On navigation projects, the gates may be set equal to the width of the lock, so that one set of bulkheads can serve both structures. It is usually desirable to use high gates rather than low gates for a given discharge, since the overall spillway width is reduced and results in a more economical spillway”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | “The gate width will be determined based on such factors as maximum desirable width of monoliths, length of spillway, bridge spans, drift loading, overall monolith [[stability]], and loads on trunnions and anchorages. On [[navigation]] projects, the gates may be set equal to the width of the lock, so that one set of bulkheads can serve both structures. It is usually desirable to use high gates rather than low gates for a given discharge, since the overall spillway width is reduced and results in a more economical spillway”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | ||
“Many new gate designs utilize hydraulic cylinder hoist systems because they are usually cost effective. However, these systems have some disadvantages and are not suited for all applications”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | “Many new gate designs utilize hydraulic cylinder hoist systems because they are usually cost effective. However, these systems have some disadvantages and are not suited for all applications”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-2702" /> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
<noautolinks>==Best Practices Resources==</noautolinks> | |||
{{Document Icon}}[[Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400) | Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400), USACE]] | |||
==Best Practices Resources== | {{Document Icon}}[[Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702)|Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702), USACE]] | ||
{{Document Icon}} | |||
{{ | |||
<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below--> | <!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below--> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:48, 11 July 2023
Bulkheads
“A bulkhead or stoplog and guides should be provided at the entrance to each water passage for dewatering the service and emergency gates for maintenance except when they are excessively costly or clearly unfeasible and other means can be improvised. When emergency gates are not required, stoplog or bulkhead guides for maintenance should always be provided upstream of the service gates”.[1]
Gates
“Controlled spillways include crest gates that serve as a movable damming surface allowing the spillway crest to be located below the normal operating level of a reservoir or channel”.[2]
“Gates are composed primarily of structural steel and are generally of welded fabrication. Structural members are typically rolled sections; however, welded built-up girders may be required for large gates”.[2]
“The hydraulic engineer will normally establish the limiting parameters for gate height and width. Within those limits, various height-to-width ratios should be studied to find the most suitable gate size for the project. The structural designer should coordinate closely with the hydraulic engineer in determining the basic limiting requirements for size and shape. The size, shape, and framing system of the gates should be selected to minimize the overall cost of the spillway, rather than the gate itself. Determination of gate size will also consider practical operation and maintenance considerations specific to the project”.[2]
“The gate width will be determined based on such factors as maximum desirable width of monoliths, length of spillway, bridge spans, drift loading, overall monolith stability, and loads on trunnions and anchorages. On navigation projects, the gates may be set equal to the width of the lock, so that one set of bulkheads can serve both structures. It is usually desirable to use high gates rather than low gates for a given discharge, since the overall spillway width is reduced and results in a more economical spillway”.[2]
“Many new gate designs utilize hydraulic cylinder hoist systems because they are usually cost effective. However, these systems have some disadvantages and are not suited for all applications”.[2]
“A properly designed anchor system will prevent structural cracking of concrete, limit deflections, account for all time-dependent stress losses, and safely accommodate specified loads for the life of the structure”.[2]
Best Practices Resources
Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works (EM 1110-2-2400), USACE
Design of Spillway Tainter Gates (EM 1110-2-2702), USACE
Citations:
Revision ID: 7088
Revision Date: 07/11/2023