Spillway Control Structures: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!-- Add picture caption --> | <!-- Add picture caption --> | ||
|caption=Labyrinth spillways are commonly installed to increase weir length and the associated discharge capacity. | |caption=Labyrinth spillways are commonly installed to increase weir length and the associated discharge capacity. | ||
(Image Source: Gannett Fleming) | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
“A major component of a spillway is the control device, which regulates the outflows from the reservoir. A control device limits or prevents outflows below fixed reservoir levels and regulates releases when the reservoir rises above that level. A control structure may consist of a sill, weir, orifice, or pipe. The discharge-head relationship may be fixed, as in the case of a simple overflow crest, or unregulated port, or it may be variable, as with a gate crest or a valve- or gate-controlled pipe”.<ref name="Small Dams">[[Design of Small Dams | Design of Small Dams, USBR, 1987]]</ref> | “A major component of a spillway is the control device, which regulates the outflows from the reservoir. A control device limits or prevents outflows below fixed reservoir levels and regulates releases when the reservoir rises above that level. A control structure may consist of a sill, weir, orifice, or pipe. The discharge-head relationship may be fixed, as in the case of a simple overflow crest, or unregulated port, or it may be variable, as with a gate crest or a valve- or gate-controlled pipe”.<ref name="Small Dams">[[Design of Small Dams | Design of Small Dams, USBR, 1987]]</ref> | ||
“A controlled crest is one that includes gates which are used to control the flow; the uncontrolled crest is one unencumbered by gates. The crest and/or gates located near the crest provide the flow control through the spillway system. The capacity of the spillway is dependent upon the crest shape, crest length, and the hydraulic head. The hydraulic head is modified by approach conditions, pier and/or abutment effects, and submergence. To provide a high-efficiency spillway and yet produce a safe, low-maintenance structure, the crest shape must provide a high discharge coefficient and fairly uniform and predictable pressures on the crest boundary”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-1603">[[Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603) | EM 1110-2-1603 | “A controlled crest is one that includes gates which are used to control the flow; the uncontrolled crest is one unencumbered by gates. The crest and/or gates located near the crest provide the flow control through the spillway system. The capacity of the spillway is dependent upon the crest shape, crest length, and the hydraulic head. The hydraulic head is modified by approach conditions, pier and/or abutment effects, and submergence. To provide a high-efficiency spillway and yet produce a safe, low-maintenance structure, the crest shape must provide a high discharge coefficient and fairly uniform and predictable pressures on the crest boundary”.<ref name="EM 1110-2-1603">[[Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603) | Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603), USACE, 1992]]</ref> | ||
“Ideally, the spillway should be designed to operate with crest control throughout the entire expected range of discharge. However, the range of expected discharge is based on the current hydrologic data. Spillway flood flow rates may change due to updated probable maximum [[precipitation]] quantities; changes in the basin runoff characteristics could vary significantly with time; and the project [[operation]] may be revised at a future date, which may result in an increase above the original spillway design flow. Any of these factors, separately or in combination, could be sufficient to cause a spillway designed for crest control to shift to conduit control in the upper range of expected discharge”.<ref name="FEMA 484">[[Technical Manual: Conduits through Embankment Dams (FEMA P-484) | | “Ideally, the spillway should be designed to operate with crest control throughout the entire expected range of discharge. However, the range of expected discharge is based on the current hydrologic data. Spillway flood flow rates may change due to updated probable maximum [[precipitation]] quantities; changes in the basin runoff characteristics could vary significantly with time; and the project [[operation]] may be revised at a future date, which may result in an increase above the original spillway design flow. Any of these factors, separately or in combination, could be sufficient to cause a spillway designed for crest control to shift to conduit control in the upper range of expected discharge”.<ref name="FEMA 484">[[Technical Manual: Conduits through Embankment Dams (FEMA P-484) | Technical Manual: Conduits through Embankment Dams (FEMA P-484), 2005]]</ref> | ||
“The value of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway in providing an extremely reliable [[operation]] and a very low-cost maintenance facility is undeniable. Topographical, geological, economical, and political considerations at many dam sites may restrict the use of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway. The solution to these problems is usually the inclusion of crest gates; however, the uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be used regardless of these considerations when the time of concentration of the basin runoff into the reservoir is less than 12 hours. When the time of concentration is between 12 and 24 hours, an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be given preference over a gated spillway. Basically, the inclusion of crest gates allows the spillway crest to be placed significantly below the maximum operating [[Reservoir Level|reservoir level]], in turn, <noautolinks>permitting</noautolinks> the entire reservoir to be used for normal operating purposes; and results in a much narrower spillway facility, avoiding the problems associated with high unit discharge/high-velocity flow and increased operation and maintenance costs. A gated spillway must include, as a minimum, two or preferably three spillway gates in order to satisfy safety concerns” <ref name="EM 1110-2-1603" /> | “The value of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway in providing an extremely reliable [[operation]] and a very low-cost maintenance facility is undeniable. Topographical, geological, economical, and political considerations at many dam sites may restrict the use of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway. The solution to these problems is usually the inclusion of crest gates; however, the uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be used regardless of these considerations when the time of concentration of the basin runoff into the reservoir is less than 12 hours. When the time of concentration is between 12 and 24 hours, an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be given preference over a gated spillway. Basically, the inclusion of crest gates allows the spillway crest to be placed significantly below the maximum operating [[Reservoir Level|reservoir level]], in turn, <noautolinks>permitting</noautolinks> the entire reservoir to be used for normal operating purposes; and results in a much narrower spillway facility, avoiding the problems associated with high unit discharge/high-velocity flow and increased operation and maintenance costs. A gated spillway must include, as a minimum, two or preferably three spillway gates in order to satisfy safety concerns” <ref name="EM 1110-2-1603" /> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
* [[Fuseplug Spillways]] | * [[Fuseplug Spillways]] | ||
* [[Fusegate Spillways]] | * [[Fusegate Spillways]] | ||
* [[Gates | Gated Spillways | * [[Gates/Bulkheads | Gated Spillways]] | ||
<noautolinks>==Best Practices Resources==</noautolinks> | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Design Standards No. 14: Appurtenant Structures for Dams (Ch. 3: General Spillway Design Considerations) | Design Standards No. 14: Appurtenant Structures for Dams (Ch. 3: General Spillway Design Considerations), USBR]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 50 - Earth Spillway Design | National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 50 - Earth Spillway Design, NRCS]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 14 - Stage Discharge Relations | National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 14 - Stage Discharge Relations, NRCS]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603) | Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603), USACE]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Design of Small Dams | Design of Small Dams, USBR]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Technical Release 210-39: Hydraulics of Broad-Crested Spillways | Technical Release 210-39: Hydraulics of Broad-Crested Spillways, NRCS]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Measurement of Peak Discharge at Dams by Indirect Method | Measurement of Peak Discharge at Dams by Indirect Method, USGS]] | |||
{{Document Icon}} [[Discharge Characteristics of Broad-Crested Weirs (GSC-397) | Discharge Characteristics of Broad-Crested Weirs (GSC-397), USGS]] | |||
<!-- In the location of an in text citation, simply enclose the citation as follows: <ref> citation </ref>. Citations will automatically populate. Learn more at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite. --> | <!-- In the location of an in text citation, simply enclose the citation as follows: <ref> citation </ref>. Citations will automatically populate. Learn more at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite. --> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 25 July 2023
|
| Labyrinth spillways are commonly installed to increase weir length and the associated discharge capacity.
(Image Source: Gannett Fleming) |
“A major component of a spillway is the control device, which regulates the outflows from the reservoir. A control device limits or prevents outflows below fixed reservoir levels and regulates releases when the reservoir rises above that level. A control structure may consist of a sill, weir, orifice, or pipe. The discharge-head relationship may be fixed, as in the case of a simple overflow crest, or unregulated port, or it may be variable, as with a gate crest or a valve- or gate-controlled pipe”.[1]
“A controlled crest is one that includes gates which are used to control the flow; the uncontrolled crest is one unencumbered by gates. The crest and/or gates located near the crest provide the flow control through the spillway system. The capacity of the spillway is dependent upon the crest shape, crest length, and the hydraulic head. The hydraulic head is modified by approach conditions, pier and/or abutment effects, and submergence. To provide a high-efficiency spillway and yet produce a safe, low-maintenance structure, the crest shape must provide a high discharge coefficient and fairly uniform and predictable pressures on the crest boundary”.[2]
“Ideally, the spillway should be designed to operate with crest control throughout the entire expected range of discharge. However, the range of expected discharge is based on the current hydrologic data. Spillway flood flow rates may change due to updated probable maximum precipitation quantities; changes in the basin runoff characteristics could vary significantly with time; and the project operation may be revised at a future date, which may result in an increase above the original spillway design flow. Any of these factors, separately or in combination, could be sufficient to cause a spillway designed for crest control to shift to conduit control in the upper range of expected discharge”.[3]
“The value of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway in providing an extremely reliable operation and a very low-cost maintenance facility is undeniable. Topographical, geological, economical, and political considerations at many dam sites may restrict the use of an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway. The solution to these problems is usually the inclusion of crest gates; however, the uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be used regardless of these considerations when the time of concentration of the basin runoff into the reservoir is less than 12 hours. When the time of concentration is between 12 and 24 hours, an uncontrolled fixed crest spillway should be given preference over a gated spillway. Basically, the inclusion of crest gates allows the spillway crest to be placed significantly below the maximum operating reservoir level, in turn, permitting the entire reservoir to be used for normal operating purposes; and results in a much narrower spillway facility, avoiding the problems associated with high unit discharge/high-velocity flow and increased operation and maintenance costs. A gated spillway must include, as a minimum, two or preferably three spillway gates in order to satisfy safety concerns” [2]
Types of Control Structures
- Broad-Crested Weirs
- Sharp-Crested Weirs
- Ogee-Crested Weirs
- Earth-Cut/Vegetated Spillways
- Labyrinth Spillways
- Piano Key Spillways
- Fuseplug Spillways
- Fusegate Spillways
- Gated Spillways
Best Practices Resources
National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 50 - Earth Spillway Design, NRCS
National Engineering Handbook: Chapter 14 - Stage Discharge Relations, NRCS
Hydraulic Design of Spillways (EM 1110-2-1603), USACE
Technical Release 210-39: Hydraulics of Broad-Crested Spillways, NRCS
Measurement of Peak Discharge at Dams by Indirect Method, USGS
Discharge Characteristics of Broad-Crested Weirs (GSC-397), USGS
Citations:
Revision ID: 7443
Revision Date: 07/25/2023