CIPP Example 2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
File:2CE6.jpg|Inserting liner into pipe | File:2CE6.jpg|Inserting liner into pipe | ||
File:2CE7.jpg|Inserting liner into pipe | File:2CE7.jpg|Inserting liner into pipe | ||
</gallery> | |||
''Note: The content on this page was originally created as part of DamOutletWorks.org (DOWL, 2018). It has subsequently been updated and reformatted as part of the Dam Safety Toolbox.'' | ''Note: The content on this page was originally created as part of DamOutletWorks.org (DOWL, 2018). It has subsequently been updated and reformatted as part of the Dam Safety Toolbox.'' | ||
[[Category:Example Pages]] | [[Category:Example Pages]] | ||
{{Revhistinf}} | {{Revhistinf}} | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 15 September 2022
Cured in place pipe was chosen as the rehabilitation alternative for this Powell County Dam for many reasons: 1) the dam was 45 feet high, so pipe replacement would have been a major effort; 2) although the host CMP pipe was beginning to deteriorate, it did not have visible holes; 3) the host CMP pipe was slightly deformed into an oblong shape, thus it was necessary to choose a “form fitting” liner like CIPP.
-
Powell County, MT Dam
-
Loading liner onto platform
-
Elevated platform used for CIPP process
-
Lowering liner
-
Extrusion Near Pipe Entrance
-
Inserting liner into pipe
-
Inserting liner into pipe
Note: The content on this page was originally created as part of DamOutletWorks.org (DOWL, 2018). It has subsequently been updated and reformatted as part of the Dam Safety Toolbox.
Revision ID: 3171
Revision Date: 09/15/2022