Rotational Stability: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category:Global Stability of a Dam]] | [[Category:Global Stability of a Dam]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
The factor of safety approach established for sliding and flotation is not appropriate for use in the evaluation of | "The factor of safety approach established for sliding and [[flotation]] is not appropriate for use in the evaluation of rotational modes of failure. Rotational behavior is evaluated by determining the location of the resultant of all applied forces with respect to the potential failure plane. This location can be determined through [[Static Analysis|static analysis]]. The entire base must be in compression for the usual load condition, to maintain full contact between the structure and the foundation, so there is no chance for higher uplift pressures to develop in a crack. This helps ensure linear behavior for common [[Loading Conditions|loading conditions]]. For the unusual load case, higher uplift pressures may develop in a relatively short crack, but this would cause only minor nonlinear behavior. For extreme load conditions on typical civil works projects, a shear or bearing failure will occur before overturning could occur. Therefore, the resultant is permitted to be anywhere within the base, and safety is ensured by the safety factor requirements for sliding and by the limits on allowable bearing stresses." <ref name="EM2100">[[Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100) | Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100), USACE, 2005]]</ref> | ||
rotational modes of failure. Rotational behavior is evaluated by determining the location of the resultant of all | |||
applied forces with respect to the potential failure plane. This location can be determined through static analysis | |||
usual load condition, to maintain full contact between the structure and the foundation, so there is no chance for | |||
higher uplift pressures to develop in a crack. This helps ensure linear behavior for common loading conditions. For | |||
the unusual load case, higher uplift pressures may develop in a relatively short crack, but this would cause only | |||
minor nonlinear behavior. For extreme load conditions on typical civil works projects, a shear or bearing failure will | |||
occur before overturning could occur. Therefore, the resultant is permitted to be anywhere within the base, and | |||
safety is ensured by the safety factor requirements for sliding and by the limits on allowable bearing stresses. | |||
The analysis for determination | The analysis for determination of the resultant location has historically been termed an overturning [[stability]] analysis. Technically, this is a misnomer since a foundation bearing, crushing of the structure toe, and/or a sliding failure will occur before the structure overturns. It is recommended that the term "overturning stability analysis" be replaced with "resultant location analysis". <ref name="EM2100"/> | ||
of the resultant location | |||
since a foundation bearing, crushing of the structure toe, and/or a sliding failure will occur before the structure | |||
overturns. | |||
==Best Practices Resources== | ==Best Practices Resources== | ||
{{Document Icon}} [[Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100)|Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100) | {{Document Icon}} [[Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100) | Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100), USACE]] | ||
<!-- In the location of an in text citation, simply enclose the citation as follows: <ref> citation </ref>. Citations will automatically populate. Learn more at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite. --> | <!-- In the location of an in text citation, simply enclose the citation as follows: <ref> citation </ref>. Citations will automatically populate. Learn more at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite. --> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:48, 11 July 2023
"The factor of safety approach established for sliding and flotation is not appropriate for use in the evaluation of rotational modes of failure. Rotational behavior is evaluated by determining the location of the resultant of all applied forces with respect to the potential failure plane. This location can be determined through static analysis. The entire base must be in compression for the usual load condition, to maintain full contact between the structure and the foundation, so there is no chance for higher uplift pressures to develop in a crack. This helps ensure linear behavior for common loading conditions. For the unusual load case, higher uplift pressures may develop in a relatively short crack, but this would cause only minor nonlinear behavior. For extreme load conditions on typical civil works projects, a shear or bearing failure will occur before overturning could occur. Therefore, the resultant is permitted to be anywhere within the base, and safety is ensured by the safety factor requirements for sliding and by the limits on allowable bearing stresses." [1]
The analysis for determination of the resultant location has historically been termed an overturning stability analysis. Technically, this is a misnomer since a foundation bearing, crushing of the structure toe, and/or a sliding failure will occur before the structure overturns. It is recommended that the term "overturning stability analysis" be replaced with "resultant location analysis". [1]
Best Practices Resources
Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures (EM 1110-2-2100), USACE
Citations:
Revision ID: 7168
Revision Date: 07/11/2023